The first engineers shape the codebase, the culture and the speed of everything after them, and they are hard to assess if you are not technical yourself. These four steps define the roles from the work ahead, run a structured and fair process, bring in technical judgement where it matters, and set the new team up to deliver.

Step 1 — Define the work, then the role

Goal: Hire for the next twelve months of work, not a generic title.

  1. List what must be built, run and maintained over the next year.
  2. Decide which work needs an in-house engineer and which can stay with a vendor or tool.
  3. Write the must-have skills for the first hire and what can wait for later hires.
  4. Agree the level, budget range and who the engineer reports to.

You finish with: A short role brief based on the actual work ahead.

Step 2 — Build a structured process

Goal: Assess every candidate on the same evidence.

  1. Write a scorecard with the must-have skills and how each will be checked.
  2. Use the same questions and a short, realistic work exercise for every candidate.
  3. Keep the exercise brief and relevant, and be clear about how long it takes.
  4. Decide who interviews for what, so no area is assessed twice or missed.

You finish with: A scorecard, question set and exercise used for every candidate.

Step 3 — Bring in technical judgement

Goal: Get a reliable view of technical skill you cannot assess yourself.

  1. Ask an experienced engineer or technical advisor to run or review the technical stages.
  2. Have them review the exercise and talk through the candidate’s decisions.
  3. Check references with questions tied to the scorecard.
  4. Make the final decision as a group, against the scorecard, not on impressions.

You finish with: A documented decision for each finalist.

Step 4 — Onboard for early delivery

Goal: Help the first hires deliver and own the system.

  1. Prepare access to code, cloud accounts and tools before day one.
  2. Set a first small project that ships something real within the first weeks.
  3. Agree how work is planned, reviewed and released.
  4. Review progress together at thirty and ninety days.

You finish with: An onboarding plan with a first shipped project and review points.

Common pitfalls

  • Hiring for a title instead of the work ahead.
  • Unstructured interviews that change from candidate to candidate.
  • Long unpaid exercises that put strong candidates off.
  • No technical reviewer when the founder cannot assess the code.

See it as a workflow

Leadership

Hiring the first engineering team

Define the roles, interview process and first-quarter plan for a company’s first in-house engineers, so hires start productive and the founder stops being the only technical judge.

See the workflow

More guides like this

Related answers

Read as Markdown Fractional CTO