Account briefs
Prepare a brief from approved company knowledge, with sources cited and a review step.
Services · 01 Configure your AI
ChatGPT and Claude consulting for growing SMBs: configure shared instructions, approved knowledge, permissions, evaluation, and practical team workflows.
Illustrative workflow
Prepare an account brief from approved company knowledge, with clear sources and a human review step.
The exact implementation depends on your tools, access, constraints, and definition of success.
What we work on
Workflow and capability review
Shared instructions and approved knowledge
Tool access and permission planning
Practical team handoff and evaluation
A good fit when
Examples
Illustrative workflow patterns, not results from a specific customer.
Prepare a brief from approved company knowledge, with sources cited and a review step.
Answer internal questions from the current policy set instead of from memory.
Draft proposals or replies in your house style, ready for a person to edit.
How it runs
We map the work, establish the boundaries, and choose the smallest useful implementation.
The trigger, the context, the handoffs and the owner.
What the workflow may read, change and must escalate.
The smallest configuration, connection or build that works.
Completed work, review effort, exceptions and cost.
What you leave with
Every engagement ends with a handoff, not a dependency.
Shared projects, instructions and approved sources so everyone gets the same quality from ChatGPT or Claude.
See the workflow OperationsAnswer staff questions from approved policies, procedures and product documents, with the source shown and a clear handoff when the answer is not there.
See the workflow OperationsTurn meeting notes or transcripts into a short summary, decisions and owned action items in the tools the team already uses.
See the workflowDirect answers
Questions
Often both have a place. We compare them on your actual tasks, data rules and existing accounts, then recommend a setup rather than a brand.
That depends on the plan and settings you use. We review the relevant options with you and configure the workspace to match your requirements.
That usually means a missing shared instruction or knowledge source. We make the good pattern the default, then check it with the evaluation set.
Related
Bring the messy version
Show us the tools, the handoffs, and the part that keeps slowing your team down.
---
title: "ChatGPT & Claude Consulting Services"
description: "ChatGPT and Claude consulting for growing SMBs: configure shared instructions, approved knowledge, permissions, evaluation, and practical team workflows."
url: https://lidvizion.ai/services/ai-setup/
site: Lid Vizion
index: https://lidvizion.ai/llms.txt
---
[Services](https://lidvizion.ai/services/) · 01 Configure your AI
# ChatGPT and Claude consulting that makes AI useful at work.
ChatGPT and Claude consulting for growing SMBs: configure shared instructions, approved knowledge, permissions, evaluation, and practical team workflows.
[Let’s map your workflow](https://lidvizion.ai/contact/) · [All services](https://lidvizion.ai/services/)
Illustrative workflow
Prepare an account brief from approved company knowledge, with clear sources and a human review step.
The exact implementation depends on your tools, access, constraints, and definition of success.
What we work on
## Deliverables you can hold us to.
1. Workflow and capability review
2. Shared instructions and approved knowledge
3. Tool access and permission planning
4. Practical team handoff and evaluation
A good fit when
## You’ll recognise the problem.
- Your team already uses ChatGPT or Claude, but results depend on who is asking.
- You have documents and policies the AI should draw from.
- You need clear rules on what AI can and cannot see.
Examples
## Where it shows up.
Illustrative workflow patterns, not results from a specific customer.
Configure your AI
### Account briefs
Prepare a brief from approved company knowledge, with sources cited and a review step.
Configure your AI
### Policy answers
Answer internal questions from the current policy set instead of from memory.
Configure your AI
### First drafts
Draft proposals or replies in your house style, ready for a person to edit.
How it runs
## Start with the operation.
We map the work, establish the boundaries, and choose the smallest useful implementation.
1. 01 / Map
The trigger, the context, the handoffs and the owner.
2. 02 / Bound
What the workflow may read, change and must escalate.
3. 03 / Implement
The smallest configuration, connection or build that works.
4. 04 / Measure
Completed work, review effort, exceptions and cost.
What you leave with
## Something your team can run.
Every engagement ends with a handoff, not a dependency.
- A shared workspace configured with instructions and approved knowledge
- Written guidance on what the AI may see, do, and must not do
- A small evaluation set to check quality over time
- A handoff session so your team can maintain the setup
Use cases
## Where teams start.
Illustrative workflow patterns for this service.
[All use cases](https://lidvizion.ai/use-cases/)
- [A consistent AI setup for the team](https://lidvizion.ai/use-cases/team-ai-setup/): Leadership Shared projects, instructions and approved sources so everyone gets the same quality from ChatGPT or Claude.
- [Internal knowledge assistant](https://lidvizion.ai/use-cases/internal-knowledge-assistant/): Operations Answer staff questions from approved policies, procedures and product documents, with the source shown and a clear handoff when the answer is not there.
- [Meeting notes to tracked actions](https://lidvizion.ai/use-cases/meeting-notes-to-actions/): Operations Turn meeting notes or transcripts into a short summary, decisions and owned action items in the tools the team already uses.
Field guides
## Run it yourself first.
Free, ungated playbooks for this kind of work.
[All guides](https://lidvizion.ai/guides/)
- [Set up ChatGPT or Claude for a team](https://lidvizion.ai/guides/set-up-chatgpt-or-claude-for-a-team/): A four-step playbook to turn scattered individual AI use into a shared, governed setup your team actually uses.
- [Build a shared prompt library for your team](https://lidvizion.ai/guides/build-a-shared-prompt-library/): A four-step playbook to turn the prompts people already rely on into a small, tested, owned library the whole team can reuse.
- [Choose an AI assistant for your team](https://lidvizion.ai/guides/choose-an-ai-assistant-for-your-team/): A four-step way to compare AI assistants on your own work, your data rules and your existing tools, so the choice rests on evidence rather than a demo.
Direct answers
## Questions buyers ask first.
[All answers](https://lidvizion.ai/answers/)
- [Does a small business need an AI use policy?](https://lidvizion.ai/answers/does-a-small-business-need-an-ai-policy/): Yes, if staff use AI tools for work — and most already do. A short policy that names the approved tools, the information that may and may not go into them, and which outputs need review protects the business without stopping useful work.
- [How can a company keep AI-generated answers accurate?](https://lidvizion.ai/answers/how-to-keep-ai-answers-accurate/): Keep AI answers accurate by limiting them to approved sources, showing the source with each answer, testing against a fixed set of real questions before and after every change, routing low-confidence or sensitive questions to a person, and naming an owner who keeps the sources current.
- [How should a company prepare its data before using AI?](https://lidvizion.ai/answers/how-to-prepare-company-data-for-ai/): Prepare only the data one priority workflow needs: find where it lives, decide who may access it, clean the fields that workflow relies on, and name an owner who keeps it current. Company-wide data projects before a first use case usually stall.
Questions
## Common questions.
### ChatGPT or Claude?
Often both have a place. We compare them on your actual tasks, data rules and existing accounts, then recommend a setup rather than a brand.
### How is our data handled?
That depends on the plan and settings you use. We review the relevant options with you and configure the workspace to match your requirements.
### What if people still use it differently?
That usually means a missing shared instruction or knowledge source. We make the good pattern the default, then check it with the evaluation set.
Related
## Other ways in.
[See all services](https://lidvizion.ai/services/)
- [Connect your tools](https://lidvizion.ai/services/integrations/): Put the right context within reach of the workflow.
- [Automate the repeatable](https://lidvizion.ai/services/automation/): Give recurring work an owner, a trigger, and a stop rule.
- [Build the missing piece](https://lidvizion.ai/services/custom-software/): Custom tools and applications for the gaps that matter.
Bring the messy version
## One workflow. A better way to run it.
Show us the tools, the handoffs, and the part that keeps slowing your team down.
[Let’s map your workflow](https://lidvizion.ai/contact/) · [Read our approach](https://lidvizion.ai/approach/)
What would you like help with?
Get the main points in plain language.
Continue with
Includes this page title and canonical URL. The prompt is copied before the provider opens; supported providers also receive it through the URL.