Use cases · Leadership
An AI pilot with a go or no-go decision
Run a short, time-boxed AI pilot on one real workflow, with success and stop criteria agreed up front, so leadership ends it with a clear decision to scale, change or stop instead of an open-ended experiment.
Where it starts
The trigger.
Leadership wants to try AI on a workflow but has no agreed way to judge the result.
How it runs today
- Pilots start without a baseline, so nobody can say whether they worked.
- Experiments drift on for months with no decision.
- Results are judged on demos rather than real work.
The workflow
Four bounded steps.
Each step has an owner and a stop rule.
- 01 / Choose
Pick one workflow with a named owner, real data and a measured baseline.
- 02 / Agree
Write down the success and stop criteria, the time box and who decides.
- 03 / Run
Run the pilot with the people who do the work, with a person reviewing every output.
- 04 / Decide
Compare results with the baseline and record a decision to scale, change or stop.
Where people stay in control
Approval points.
- The workflow owner reviews outputs throughout the pilot.
- Leadership makes and records the final decision.
- Customer or employee data is used only as the AI policy allows.
How we would measure it
Against a baseline.
Measured before and after, on the same work.
Result against the agreed baseline.
Pilots that end with a recorded decision on time.
Time from decision to production for pilots that scale.
Related
Go deeper.
More use cases
Other places to start.
From stalled AI pilot to production
Take a pilot that impressed in a demo but never shipped, decide whether it deserves production, and get it there with owners and controls.
See the workflow LeadershipA company-wide AI rollout with rules people follow
Move from scattered personal AI accounts to one approved setup, a short policy and a first set of shared workflows the whole company uses.
See the workflow LeadershipQuarterly AI usage and risk review
Each quarter, take stock of which AI tools people actually use, what data goes into them and how that matches policy, so leadership can approve, restrict or retire tools with evidence instead of guesswork.
See the workflowAn illustrative workflow pattern, not a result from a specific customer.
Bring the messy version
One workflow.
A better way to run it.
Show us the tools, the handoffs, and the part that keeps slowing your team down.
---
title: "An AI pilot with a go or no-go decision: AI Use Case"
description: "Run a short, time-boxed AI pilot on one real workflow, with success and stop criteria agreed up front, so leadership ends it with a clear decision to scale, change or stop instead of an open-ended experiment."
url: https://lidvizion.ai/use-cases/ai-pilot-with-a-go-no-go-decision/
site: Lid Vizion
index: https://lidvizion.ai/llms.txt
---
[Use cases](https://lidvizion.ai/use-cases/) · Leadership
# An AI pilot with a go or no-go decision
Run a short, time-boxed AI pilot on one real workflow, with success and stop criteria agreed up front, so leadership ends it with a clear decision to scale, change or stop instead of an open-ended experiment.
[Talk through this workflow](https://lidvizion.ai/contact/?need=fractional-chief-ai-officer&from=%2Fuse-cases%2Fai-pilot-with-a-go-no-go-decision%2F#write) · [Fractional Chief AI Officer](https://lidvizion.ai/services/fractional-chief-ai-officer/)
Where it starts
## The trigger.
Leadership wants to try AI on a workflow but has no agreed way to judge the result.
How it runs today
- Pilots start without a baseline, so nobody can say whether they worked.
- Experiments drift on for months with no decision.
- Results are judged on demos rather than real work.
The workflow
## Four bounded steps.
Each step has an owner and a stop rule.
1. 01 / Choose
Pick one workflow with a named owner, real data and a measured baseline.
2. 02 / Agree
Write down the success and stop criteria, the time box and who decides.
3. 03 / Run
Run the pilot with the people who do the work, with a person reviewing every output.
4. 04 / Decide
Compare results with the baseline and record a decision to scale, change or stop.
Where people stay in control
## Approval points.
- The workflow owner reviews outputs throughout the pilot.
- Leadership makes and records the final decision.
- Customer or employee data is used only as the AI policy allows.
How we would measure it
## Against a baseline.
Measured before and after, on the same work.
### Result against the agreed baseline.
### Pilots that end with a recorded decision on time.
### Time from decision to production for pilots that scale.
Related
## Go deeper.
- [Fractional Chief AI Officer](https://lidvizion.ai/services/fractional-chief-ai-officer/): We connect AI strategy to the workflows, controls, tools, people, and measurements required to make it useful.
- [Fine-tuning vs. pre-trained models](https://lidvizion.ai/resources/basics/model-fine-tuning-vs-pre-trained-models/): Why most teams should start with a capable pre-trained model, and when fine-tuning earns its cost.
- [Run an AI pilot that ends in a decision](https://lidvizion.ai/guides/run-an-ai-pilot-that-ends-in-a-decision/): A four-step playbook to choose the right workflow, agree success and stop criteria up front, run a time-boxed pilot with real users and finish with a recorded decision.
- [How to run an AI pilot](https://lidvizion.ai/answers/how-to-run-an-ai-pilot/): How should a company run an AI pilot so it leads to a real decision?
More use cases
## Other places to start.
[All use cases](https://lidvizion.ai/use-cases/)
- [From stalled AI pilot to production](https://lidvizion.ai/use-cases/stalled-ai-pilot-to-production/): Leadership Take a pilot that impressed in a demo but never shipped, decide whether it deserves production, and get it there with owners and controls.
- [A company-wide AI rollout with rules people follow](https://lidvizion.ai/use-cases/company-wide-ai-rollout/): Leadership Move from scattered personal AI accounts to one approved setup, a short policy and a first set of shared workflows the whole company uses.
- [Quarterly AI usage and risk review](https://lidvizion.ai/use-cases/quarterly-ai-usage-review/): Leadership Each quarter, take stock of which AI tools people actually use, what data goes into them and how that matches policy, so leadership can approve, restrict or retire tools with evidence instead of guesswork.
An illustrative workflow pattern, not a result from a specific customer.
Bring the messy version
## One workflow. A better way to run it.
Show us the tools, the handoffs, and the part that keeps slowing your team down.
[Let’s map your workflow](https://lidvizion.ai/contact/) · [Read our approach](https://lidvizion.ai/approach/)