Use cases · Finance

Expense report review

Check each expense claim against the policy and its receipts, prepare the approval with anything unusual flagged, and leave the decision with the approver and finance.

Where it starts

The trigger.

An employee submits an expense report.

How it runs today

  • Approvers sign off without reading every receipt.
  • Finance finds missing receipts and policy breaches after payment.
  • Similar claims are treated differently depending on who approves them.

The workflow

Four bounded steps.

Each step has an owner and a stop rule.

  1. 01 / Read

    Read each line and its receipt: date, merchant, amount, category and attendees.

  2. 02 / Check

    Compare against the written expense policy, limits and project codes.

  3. 03 / Flag

    Mark missing receipts, over-limit items, duplicates and unusual merchants with the reason.

  4. 04 / Approve

    The approver and finance review flags and approve, return or adjust the claim.

Where people stay in control

Approval points.

  • An approver and finance decide every claim; nothing is paid automatically.
  • Flags are explained so employees can correct claims, not treated as accusations.

How we would measure it

Against a baseline.

Measured before and after, on the same work.

Time from submission to reimbursement.

Policy issues caught before rather than after payment.

Claims returned for correction.

Related

Go deeper.

More use cases

Other places to start.

All use cases

An illustrative workflow pattern, not a result from a specific customer.

Bring the messy version

One workflow.
A better way to run it.

Show us the tools, the handoffs, and the part that keeps slowing your team down.

Explore with AI

What would you like help with?

Get the main points in plain language.

Continue with

Includes this page title and canonical URL. The prompt is copied before the provider opens; supported providers also receive it through the URL.