Use cases · Leadership
A cloud and software cost review
Find out what the company pays for cloud, software and vendors, what each line does, and what can be cut, right-sized or renegotiated without risk.
Where it starts
The trigger.
Technology spend keeps rising and nobody can explain every line on the bill.
How it runs today
- Cloud accounts and subscriptions were set up by people who have since left.
- Unused environments, seats and services keep billing.
- Nobody owns the decision to change a vendor or plan.
The workflow
Four bounded steps.
Each step has an owner and a stop rule.
- 01 / Inventory
List every cloud account, subscription and vendor with its owner and purpose.
- 02 / Measure
Match each cost to the product, team or workflow it supports.
- 03 / Decide
Mark each line keep, right-size, consolidate or cancel, with the risk noted.
- 04 / Act
Make the safe changes first, schedule the rest and assign an owner to the bill.
Where people stay in control
Approval points.
- Leadership approves every cancellation or vendor change.
- Changes to production systems follow a tested rollback plan.
How we would measure it
Against a baseline.
Measured before and after, on the same work.
Monthly technology spend before and after.
Share of spend with a named owner.
Services cancelled without an incident.
Related
Go deeper.
More use cases
Other places to start.
An AI tool and vendor decision you can defend
Replace scattered subscriptions and competing vendor pitches with one decision, made on your workflows, data rules and costs.
See the workflow LeadershipA technology roadmap the board can follow
Turn scattered technical priorities into a sequenced roadmap with owners, costs and risks that non-technical leaders can hold you to.
See the workflow LeadershipTechnical due diligence preparation
Get the technology, code and security story in order before investors or an acquirer ask, so diligence confirms the plan instead of derailing it.
See the workflowAn illustrative workflow pattern, not a result from a specific customer.
Bring the messy version
One workflow.
A better way to run it.
Show us the tools, the handoffs, and the part that keeps slowing your team down.
---
title: "A cloud and software cost review: AI Use Case"
description: "Find out what the company pays for cloud, software and vendors, what each line does, and what can be cut, right-sized or renegotiated without risk."
url: https://lidvizion.ai/use-cases/cloud-cost-review/
site: Lid Vizion
index: https://lidvizion.ai/llms.txt
---
[Use cases](https://lidvizion.ai/use-cases/) · Leadership
# A cloud and software cost review
Find out what the company pays for cloud, software and vendors, what each line does, and what can be cut, right-sized or renegotiated without risk.
[Talk through this workflow](https://lidvizion.ai/contact/?need=fractional-cto&from=%2Fuse-cases%2Fcloud-cost-review%2F#write) · [Fractional CTO](https://lidvizion.ai/services/fractional-cto/)
Where it starts
## The trigger.
Technology spend keeps rising and nobody can explain every line on the bill.
How it runs today
- Cloud accounts and subscriptions were set up by people who have since left.
- Unused environments, seats and services keep billing.
- Nobody owns the decision to change a vendor or plan.
The workflow
## Four bounded steps.
Each step has an owner and a stop rule.
1. 01 / Inventory
List every cloud account, subscription and vendor with its owner and purpose.
2. 02 / Measure
Match each cost to the product, team or workflow it supports.
3. 03 / Decide
Mark each line keep, right-size, consolidate or cancel, with the risk noted.
4. 04 / Act
Make the safe changes first, schedule the rest and assign an owner to the bill.
Where people stay in control
## Approval points.
- Leadership approves every cancellation or vendor change.
- Changes to production systems follow a tested rollback plan.
How we would measure it
## Against a baseline.
Measured before and after, on the same work.
### Monthly technology spend before and after.
### Share of spend with a named owner.
### Services cancelled without an incident.
Related
## Go deeper.
- [Fractional CTO](https://lidvizion.ai/services/fractional-cto/): Senior technical ownership for companies that need direction and execution without immediately adding a full-time CTO.
- [Edge vs. cloud deployment](https://lidvizion.ai/resources/basics/edge-vs-cloud-deployment/): Where a model should run: next to the camera or sensor, or in a data centre.
- [Review your cloud bill in two weeks](https://lidvizion.ai/guides/review-your-cloud-bill-in-two-weeks/): A four-step playbook to find out what your cloud spend pays for, remove obvious waste and give every remaining cost an owner, without a rewrite.
- [How to reduce cloud and software costs](https://lidvizion.ai/answers/how-to-reduce-cloud-and-software-costs/): How can a growing company reduce its cloud and software costs without slowing the team down?
More use cases
## Other places to start.
[All use cases](https://lidvizion.ai/use-cases/)
- [An AI tool and vendor decision you can defend](https://lidvizion.ai/use-cases/ai-tool-and-vendor-decision/): Leadership Replace scattered subscriptions and competing vendor pitches with one decision, made on your workflows, data rules and costs.
- [A technology roadmap the board can follow](https://lidvizion.ai/use-cases/technology-roadmap-for-the-board/): Leadership Turn scattered technical priorities into a sequenced roadmap with owners, costs and risks that non-technical leaders can hold you to.
- [Technical due diligence preparation](https://lidvizion.ai/use-cases/technical-due-diligence-prep/): Leadership Get the technology, code and security story in order before investors or an acquirer ask, so diligence confirms the plan instead of derailing it.
An illustrative workflow pattern, not a result from a specific customer.
Bring the messy version
## One workflow. A better way to run it.
Show us the tools, the handoffs, and the part that keeps slowing your team down.
[Let’s map your workflow](https://lidvizion.ai/contact/) · [Read our approach](https://lidvizion.ai/approach/)