Use cases · Operations

RFI and submittal tracking

Read incoming requests for information and submittals, log the key fields, track who owes a response and by when, and give the project team a short list of what is overdue each morning.

Where it starts

The trigger.

A request for information or a submittal arrives by email, upload or project platform.

How it runs today

  • RFIs and submittals are logged by hand into a spreadsheet, often late.
  • Nobody can see at a glance which responses are overdue or who owes them.
  • Answers get lost in long email threads.

The workflow

Four bounded steps.

Each step has an owner and a stop rule.

  1. 01 / Read

    Extract the number, subject, drawing or spec references, requester, reviewer and due date.

  2. 02 / Log

    Add the item to the project log with a link to the source document.

  3. 03 / Track

    Track status and send reminders to whoever owes a response before it is due.

  4. 04 / Report

    Send the project lead a short daily list of overdue and soon-due items.

Where people stay in control

Approval points.

  • Engineers and architects write every technical response.
  • The project lead confirms log entries that were flagged as unclear.

How we would measure it

Against a baseline.

Measured before and after, on the same work.

Items logged within one working day of arrival.

Overdue RFIs and submittals.

Time spent maintaining the log each week.

Related

Go deeper.

More use cases

Other places to start.

All use cases

An illustrative workflow pattern, not a result from a specific customer.

Bring the messy version

One workflow.
A better way to run it.

Show us the tools, the handoffs, and the part that keeps slowing your team down.

Explore with AI

What would you like help with?

Get the main points in plain language.

Continue with

Includes this page title and canonical URL. The prompt is copied before the provider opens; supported providers also receive it through the URL.